Hey,
i posted the following on the "nativeamerican (the real deal)" tribe just now and thought i ought to pass it by here, to perhaps engage in a meaningful discussion even tho it likely isn't perhaps what you're at all used to, but which the Four Agreements may be applied to (or not?). All thoughtful input is welcome; and i happen to think the ideas i'm discussing here could be crucial along the agreements i'm designing for my *own* way. Perhaps there's something here for others here as well? (feel free to "privately" discuss this with me if you think public discussion might be problematic)
(Longer time members of this "tribe" will recall that i've levelled my own criticisms here from time to time; now's your chance to level some at me, if you think that's what i need!)
Anyway, do go see the thread (nativeamericantherealdeal.tribe.net/thread/bcb08ddd-62d8-41de-832b-a0ac5c284c87 (dang, is that url looong or what?) so you get a taste of what's going on o'er there. (I also seek input about Funbags' ideas, as i've engaged him critically and he says he's listening)
::::::the post:::::
angel, you're taking what i said way outta context, becuz i never leveled "apple indian' on anyone except in generalization (I was thinking of non-traditional native people like Dickie Wilson, the ex-Pine Ridge b.i.a.-subsidized tyrant). Maybe you *like* feeling offended, i dunno,,, just watch out that your knee doesn't jerk up too high and knock you out!
And, yeah, i will say that you're playing (or being played by?) the race card by reducing people down to ability to comprehend or not ***simply due to their race!*** So, you're offended? Then maybe that's a GOOD thing for you to be,,,,Perhaps it's gOOd for you in your life process-ingz,,,,(((i'm of the skooL that sayz *protect by strategies of enrichment, not restriction*)))
A "radical" example about your saying "all white people" cannot see because of their "cultural lexicon" ***can be turned on its head*** by recalling that there are traditional Laplanders and other traditional europeans (who are "white") who CAN comprehend being indigeneous. Why? Because they have not been completely separated from their traditions like most other DOMESTICATED white folks! So there. *****And this is what i'm trying to get at about analysis that remains stuck in PC-type superficial consciousness!***** (I'm assuming you're quite prone to Politically Correct (PC) thinking due to the reference to zmag; not exactly a "radical" publication (tho I'm glad they publish Chomsky as much as they do). --Just the fact that they don't seem to ever escape race analysis exposes their superficial analysis. ((You wanna go into that? Let's do it!))
So that's a quick example. A less easy to digest example, apparently for you --perhaps because your degree in White Studies ((grin)) comes from too much institutionalized thinking-- is that "white folks"/domesticated folks, like any other human being, CAN evolve their/our thinking! We CAN be radicalized (tho perhaps only by repeated stinging slaps/punches in our face with reality, and then either stumbling upon meaningful alts or being welcomed into de-domesticating communities, i.e. traditional indigenous folks). And we *can* experience and realize growing connections to Mom Earth in ways that our "cultural lexicon" doesn't teach us! Imagine that! (i for one got one type of connection when i was bicycle bush-camping in nw alberta, canada more than 20 years ago and saw a bear face to face; it wasn't the sighting that did it, it was how *something* took over my will and *froze* me. Consciously, i couldn't do anything but look "out of the corner of my eye" while staring straight ahead. And that gave me a paradigm shift that my "cultural lexicon" never even discussed!)
But you seem to be like so many strategically challenged PC proto- fascists who simply cannot allow yourselves to think beyond rigid, hysterified truths (so convenient for the games and tactics of perpetual domesticators, INCLUDING The Leftwing of domestication)--****WHEN you reduce human beings down to being simply the color of their skin!!!****
So BE offended. Maybe it's time you EVOLVED YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS beyond zmag-style superficial liberal analysis ***(not that the "conservative" side of domestication is any better!)***, and listened to, watched, or read someone like John Trudell! You folks wanna talk about "the real deal" so much,,,,or is that just another gimmick for AIM,Inc-style games?
I DO accept that people who look different than white, domesticated folks don't experience the "privileges" that we take for granted ****(tho I tend to question the idea of calling such "privileges", and think critical thinking folks ought to come up with words that *say what we mean* more clearly, so that we dileneate between false/alienated values and things like having clean, running water)****. And I also accept things like that y'all get profiled more heavily, and that y'all may well not be able to even nicely say no to cops who want to, say, search your vehicle. I can accept that; ***but at the same time I see that there's also A MANDATE, ordered upon cops from their 'superiors' (which can are being revoked more and more, as reality is more and more exposed; recall airport profiling of people like Cat Stevens) to treat white, domesticated folks (especially the rich, upper, and middle class-looking variety) with more "lenience". I can accept this. But I see that profiling, "unprofessional" cops, and shit like that is a decision not BASED in race so much as on policies made to keep people alienated, divided, and conquered! (and that goes for whites as well as "redskins"! Because if we were to informally get beyond the war of race (and the wars of so much else), and see each other as ALL tooled people, we would become "threatening"!
But as long as we submit to these constructs that "our leaders" have thought up for us, and as long as we get side-tracked by hierarchizing which group is "Has it Worst" and which group "Doesn't", we will continue to be fooled and tooled! We will continue to be ghetto-ized and incapable of coming together in authentic momentums of mutual liberation!
So, to conclude, i'm GLAD you're pissed. Maybe you (or others drawn to this real deal) will actually think things out after you get tired of foaming at the mouth!
Now, I'm saying all this and I'm sticking around here because I know I ain't got all the answers, either. But I'm not one of those fake Nice people who play all subordinate just becuz you are a different race, or becuz you say i had better. And so, no, i ain't going to follow your orders just becuz you're a claimed or real full or part Native! I ain't going to submit to *any* "authority" just because of what they say I BETTER do (or ELSE). Fuck that bullshit; I stand for a world where you are free to speak your mind/heart and so am i! i listen to my intuitions and consciousness and i stand by such, until someone comes along who can trip me out of that! (And it's happened before; i recall one time when a native guy was leading a sweat and he was drinking Pepsi...and i was all privately pissed and thinking he's going to be full of bullshit...but then during the sweat i was letting loose with my own stuff, yelling out, and suddenly he cut loose with a yell, which, with that alone, i understood was from the HEART. And it was something like i'd never heard or imagined!)
So i'm not claiming to have a monopoly on truth --like you. But i'm a three-spirit cavorts-between (aka natives hav called us "winktes") and i stick to my intutions, after a lifetime of experiences, self-liberation study, and speaking up no matter what.
Anyway, i don't mind being "made an example of" for how to deal with independent thinking that isn't PC enough for perhaps many of you. And at the same time i can admit that i may need some forms of "attitude adjustment" for some of my feelings.
daring to be "radically excellent" with y'all,
in "perfectly imperfect" wayz,,,,
touch-ahcity
i posted the following on the "nativeamerican (the real deal)" tribe just now and thought i ought to pass it by here, to perhaps engage in a meaningful discussion even tho it likely isn't perhaps what you're at all used to, but which the Four Agreements may be applied to (or not?). All thoughtful input is welcome; and i happen to think the ideas i'm discussing here could be crucial along the agreements i'm designing for my *own* way. Perhaps there's something here for others here as well? (feel free to "privately" discuss this with me if you think public discussion might be problematic)
(Longer time members of this "tribe" will recall that i've levelled my own criticisms here from time to time; now's your chance to level some at me, if you think that's what i need!)
Anyway, do go see the thread (nativeamericantherealdeal.tribe.net/thread/bcb08ddd-62d8-41de-832b-a0ac5c284c87 (dang, is that url looong or what?) so you get a taste of what's going on o'er there. (I also seek input about Funbags' ideas, as i've engaged him critically and he says he's listening)
::::::the post:::::
angel, you're taking what i said way outta context, becuz i never leveled "apple indian' on anyone except in generalization (I was thinking of non-traditional native people like Dickie Wilson, the ex-Pine Ridge b.i.a.-subsidized tyrant). Maybe you *like* feeling offended, i dunno,,, just watch out that your knee doesn't jerk up too high and knock you out!
And, yeah, i will say that you're playing (or being played by?) the race card by reducing people down to ability to comprehend or not ***simply due to their race!*** So, you're offended? Then maybe that's a GOOD thing for you to be,,,,Perhaps it's gOOd for you in your life process-ingz,,,,(((i'm of the skooL that sayz *protect by strategies of enrichment, not restriction*)))
A "radical" example about your saying "all white people" cannot see because of their "cultural lexicon" ***can be turned on its head*** by recalling that there are traditional Laplanders and other traditional europeans (who are "white") who CAN comprehend being indigeneous. Why? Because they have not been completely separated from their traditions like most other DOMESTICATED white folks! So there. *****And this is what i'm trying to get at about analysis that remains stuck in PC-type superficial consciousness!***** (I'm assuming you're quite prone to Politically Correct (PC) thinking due to the reference to zmag; not exactly a "radical" publication (tho I'm glad they publish Chomsky as much as they do). --Just the fact that they don't seem to ever escape race analysis exposes their superficial analysis. ((You wanna go into that? Let's do it!))
So that's a quick example. A less easy to digest example, apparently for you --perhaps because your degree in White Studies ((grin)) comes from too much institutionalized thinking-- is that "white folks"/domesticated folks, like any other human being, CAN evolve their/our thinking! We CAN be radicalized (tho perhaps only by repeated stinging slaps/punches in our face with reality, and then either stumbling upon meaningful alts or being welcomed into de-domesticating communities, i.e. traditional indigenous folks). And we *can* experience and realize growing connections to Mom Earth in ways that our "cultural lexicon" doesn't teach us! Imagine that! (i for one got one type of connection when i was bicycle bush-camping in nw alberta, canada more than 20 years ago and saw a bear face to face; it wasn't the sighting that did it, it was how *something* took over my will and *froze* me. Consciously, i couldn't do anything but look "out of the corner of my eye" while staring straight ahead. And that gave me a paradigm shift that my "cultural lexicon" never even discussed!)
But you seem to be like so many strategically challenged PC proto- fascists who simply cannot allow yourselves to think beyond rigid, hysterified truths (so convenient for the games and tactics of perpetual domesticators, INCLUDING The Leftwing of domestication)--****WHEN you reduce human beings down to being simply the color of their skin!!!****
So BE offended. Maybe it's time you EVOLVED YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS beyond zmag-style superficial liberal analysis ***(not that the "conservative" side of domestication is any better!)***, and listened to, watched, or read someone like John Trudell! You folks wanna talk about "the real deal" so much,,,,or is that just another gimmick for AIM,Inc-style games?
I DO accept that people who look different than white, domesticated folks don't experience the "privileges" that we take for granted ****(tho I tend to question the idea of calling such "privileges", and think critical thinking folks ought to come up with words that *say what we mean* more clearly, so that we dileneate between false/alienated values and things like having clean, running water)****. And I also accept things like that y'all get profiled more heavily, and that y'all may well not be able to even nicely say no to cops who want to, say, search your vehicle. I can accept that; ***but at the same time I see that there's also A MANDATE, ordered upon cops from their 'superiors' (which can are being revoked more and more, as reality is more and more exposed; recall airport profiling of people like Cat Stevens) to treat white, domesticated folks (especially the rich, upper, and middle class-looking variety) with more "lenience". I can accept this. But I see that profiling, "unprofessional" cops, and shit like that is a decision not BASED in race so much as on policies made to keep people alienated, divided, and conquered! (and that goes for whites as well as "redskins"! Because if we were to informally get beyond the war of race (and the wars of so much else), and see each other as ALL tooled people, we would become "threatening"!
But as long as we submit to these constructs that "our leaders" have thought up for us, and as long as we get side-tracked by hierarchizing which group is "Has it Worst" and which group "Doesn't", we will continue to be fooled and tooled! We will continue to be ghetto-ized and incapable of coming together in authentic momentums of mutual liberation!
So, to conclude, i'm GLAD you're pissed. Maybe you (or others drawn to this real deal) will actually think things out after you get tired of foaming at the mouth!
Now, I'm saying all this and I'm sticking around here because I know I ain't got all the answers, either. But I'm not one of those fake Nice people who play all subordinate just becuz you are a different race, or becuz you say i had better. And so, no, i ain't going to follow your orders just becuz you're a claimed or real full or part Native! I ain't going to submit to *any* "authority" just because of what they say I BETTER do (or ELSE). Fuck that bullshit; I stand for a world where you are free to speak your mind/heart and so am i! i listen to my intuitions and consciousness and i stand by such, until someone comes along who can trip me out of that! (And it's happened before; i recall one time when a native guy was leading a sweat and he was drinking Pepsi...and i was all privately pissed and thinking he's going to be full of bullshit...but then during the sweat i was letting loose with my own stuff, yelling out, and suddenly he cut loose with a yell, which, with that alone, i understood was from the HEART. And it was something like i'd never heard or imagined!)
So i'm not claiming to have a monopoly on truth --like you. But i'm a three-spirit cavorts-between (aka natives hav called us "winktes") and i stick to my intutions, after a lifetime of experiences, self-liberation study, and speaking up no matter what.
Anyway, i don't mind being "made an example of" for how to deal with independent thinking that isn't PC enough for perhaps many of you. And at the same time i can admit that i may need some forms of "attitude adjustment" for some of my feelings.
daring to be "radically excellent" with y'all,
in "perfectly imperfect" wayz,,,,
touch-ahcity
-
Re: Okay, what is wrong with this picture?
Mon, March 19, 2007 - 3:40 PMI'm responding to this because you specifically asked for feedback. See if you can take this in and mull it over before you justify, defend or disregard. It is my opinion and observation. I'm sure there is judgement mixed up in there. And I won't lie, I am annoyed by your post and your actions. I'm not clean. Most of us aren't.
dude, are you looking for a "there there" or a pat on the back? You go into Native American space as a non-native person and propose an idea that isn't welcome. The proper thing to do at that point is either listen to why it isn't welcome, learn, express gratitude and leave or just leave if you can't do the rest.
It is completely disrespectful and typical of white men (yes I'm generalizing with good reason) to barge in to space that is specifically set aside for someone who is not white and male, take up space and be all entitled and righteous and THEN to take from that space and take what you gather elsewhere into non-native space (being this tribe).
In my opinion, crossposting without permission is rude (even if it's a public tribe). You're obviously not concerned about being rude though. Your perogative.
For one, a warrior has nothing to defend. If you really felt that you were in your integrity, you wouldn't feel the need to take up so much space with your defensiveness. You wouldn't feel the need to bring the argument that you're losing elsewhere so that you can feel like a winner again.
You asked about the application of The Four Agreements. Here are some questions to ask yourself.
Am I taking things personally by being defensive and by needing validation that I'm a good person from others?
Am I making assumptions by assuming that others should think as I think and believe as I believe. Am I assuming that I know what's best for others? Honestly.
And
What is my attachment to being right.
I'm not here to argue. Take it or leave it. Please though, consider how much space white people take up in this world and how much power white people have compared to indigenous folks. Is it really surprising that many native people have so little patience for most white folks?
It won't kill you to shut up and listen.
-
-
Re: Okay, what is wrong with this picture?
Mon, March 19, 2007 - 11:01 PMI stand for a world where you are free to speak your mind/heart and so am i!
a world?
hmmm...
sounds like the good old 'AMERICAN WAY' to me. I don't seem to recall the south Koreans, Tibetans, or the Iraqui people to have that world wide right to speak or BE.
Mybe sitting around arguing with our brothers and sisters in cyberspace is a lot easier than actually doing something postitive for the World than not arguing or justifying an outdated way of thinking.
Last I checked there was only the Human Race; color of skin, heritage or culture does not an alternate RACE make. The posting above instills a feeling that some are losing the race.
Peace.
Indigo -
-
Re: Okay, what is wrong with this picture?
Wed, March 21, 2007 - 12:32 AMStormaldo, INDIGO...thankye for your heart-felt sharing. And Stormaldo, i *did* read the whole thing before writing. i even wrote down the gist of what you spoke (figure i can use those in future comix quotes!).
What i'm seeing in the both of y'all is *assumptions* yourself. But i am seeking to see behind what you are saying, and looking there. I'm thinking that you are saying what you believe would be said to you, or what has been said to you. And that is the limit of your imaginations.
What i'm getting at is *a completely different perception of reality*.
And so i'm not stymying myself/getting bogged down in "normal" conceptions of reality. Thus, domesticated versions of morality, for one, aren't bogging me down. And i'm not allowing *permissions* (from the hierarchy of Those Others, supposedly unlike me/we?), nor am i subordinating to the generalization that says, when "white man" does things, "white man" is over-stepping; UNLESS he is given some formal honors. Or is a "reputable"-type authority. Well, is it not so?
Look, i am escaping those corrals. i am escaping ideology. My life and safety are back in *my* hands! i will speak openly of what i do and who i have been, with any native depth charger who feelz moved to meet me whenever such happens. And such has already happened more than a few times.
And no, this ain't only empty talk. Check out www.angelfire.com/folk/magixn...ggindex.html for a sample.
Okay, methinx a lot of this went over the both o' yor headz. Amiright or what? All i can say is, maybe it's time you stopped reading AIM,Inc and started looking into Autonomous AIM and the history of those who have been getting a lot of shit (up to now) for taking most-daring stands. For instance, Russell Means ( www.russellmeans.com/speech.html ). Now, i know he wallops "white men"; but there is more going on than meets the eye, and that is *precisely* why people like him are STILL under attack. And the tricks those attackers use against Means are very good indicators of the game of "wool being pulled over eyes" that is used against any others who buck The Meta Game (that one which Rationalists and Mental "Health" Advocates are using 100% of their efforts to maintain and perpetuate in our minds).
And, as i can predict, you (knowingly or unknowingly, or a smattering of the three (heh)) use similar arguments (Politically Correct-type hype and obfuscation) to them. And i can imagine that this is *so* because you are still quite uncritical products of your domestication.
Now, as for judgement? My alleged judging others? Was that one of the Four Agreements? Okay, let's say it was in there somewhere. Probably around Impeccable With Your Word. Well, this is not *about* judging. You are the ones using that label on me. You did not ask me; and i *do appreciate* your honesty there! Yet what i am up to is a process-ing (if i could hand-draw right now, you'd see an "eye" in the "g", and a nose). And it iz connect'd with depth being as well.
So, to get to the gist, you are saying what reflects you. And so am i. Only i'm directing such at a people whom have largely not forgotten about the value of such truth speaking/sharing, when the mood moves us.
a-ho, to all my relations! (heh heh)
we are *all* descendants of tribes
and we can jujitsu the domestication planted in our heads
towards mutualities of liberation,
depending on our DARING! -
-
to be clear
Wed, March 21, 2007 - 12:46 AMTo add a bit...
i *do not* seek to compete/win.
i *do not* make assumptions that my humanity "isn't welcome" (and if it isn't, that's okay too; i will still share!)
i *do not* subordinate myself at the altar of most domesticates who:
Uncritically accept and subordinate to the meta Rules (made by others they don't know) and other demands
i *do* listen to my intuitions about *radically respecting* my fellow human beings.
i *do not* accept value systems which try to force me into their supposedly Perfect mode of morality and other *beliefs* which can never allow input from fellow human beings.
i am *concerned* about reaching people; the word "rude" i see as a value-laden trick being forced into my informal human interactions in order to get me to subordinate myself like those others who feel they must, for some reason which i don't think they've really thought out.
My interest in sharing with fellow human beings here, is not, in my reality, about "being defensive" or otherwise Politically Incorrect. Nor is it about "winning" or "losing" (or other hierarchical competition).
This is goOd stuff to hear, tho, and i am glad you have shared such. Perhaps we will begin permitting ourselves to use/tool this forum in ways which are TRULY meaningful, instead of the usual fare seen so much on forums by (and "for") domesticated human beings.
With radical's radicaL spiRit,
seeking and sharing with fellow domesticates
while RIPPING OUT of the many binds,
i am touching ah-city!
-
Re: Okay, what is wrong with this picture?
Thu, March 22, 2007 - 8:14 PM>>>And, as i can predict, you (knowingly or unknowingly, or a smattering of the three (heh)) use similar arguments (Politically Correct-type hype and obfuscation) to them. And i can imagine that this is *so* because you are still quite uncritical products of your domestication.
ohmigawd this makes me laugh...
Storm and Indigo, you are like, sooooo domesticated.
lolololololol
-
-
Re: Okay, what is wrong with this picture?
Mon, April 2, 2007 - 12:45 AMi say we *all* have various levels of domestication within us, how could such not be so? i mean, we *all* have blindspots, after all! To be perfectly imperfect, is human, and probably true for *everything*...agreements?
-
-
-
-